POMEGA offers plenty of green technology to skin care

The term “technology” refers to the application of knowledge for practical purposes.

The field of “green technology” encompasses a continuously evolving group of methods and materials, from techniques for generating energy to non-toxic cleaning products or no toxic skin care and cosmetics.

The present expectation is that this field will bring innovation and changes in daily life of similar magnitude to the “information technology” explosion over the last two decades. In these early stages, it is impossible to predict what “green technology” may eventually encompass. The goals that inform developments in this rapidly growing field include: Sustainability - meeting the needs of society in ways that can continue indefinitely into the future without damaging or depleting natural resources. In short, meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.“Cradle to cradle” design - ending the “cradle to grave” cycle of manufactured products, by creating products that can be fully reclaimed or re-used.

"Source reduction" - reducing waste and pollution by changing patterns of production and consumption.Innovation - developing alternatives to technologies - whether fossil fuel or chemical intensive agriculture - that have been demonstrated to damage health and the environment.

"Viability" - creating a center of economic activity around technologies and products that benefit the environment, speeding their implementation and creating new careers that truly protect the planet.Examples of green technology subject areas

"Energy" Perhaps the most urgent issue for green technology, this includes the development of alternative fuels, new means of generating energy and energy efficiency.

"Green building" Green building encompasses everything from the choice of building materials to where a building is located.Environmentally preferred purchasingThis government innovation involves the search for products whose contents and methods of production have the smallest possible impact on the environment, and mandates that these be the preferred products for government purchasing.

"Green chemistry" The invention, design and application of chemical products and processes to reduce or to eliminate the use and generation of hazardous substances.

"Green nanotechnology" Nanotechnology involves the manipulation of materials at the scale of the nanometer, one billionth of a meter. Some scientists believe that mastery of this subject is forthcoming that will transform the way that everything in the world is manufactured.

“Green nanotechnology” is the application of green chemistry and green engineering principles to this field.

POMEGA is a green technology company. www.pomega5.com

POMEGA's products contain pomegranate seed oil -- Omega 5 oil

What to shop for your men? think POMEGA5 natural skin care

Shop Wisely

The most important part of a man’s skin care regime is shaving and while this has been a ritual practised by men for centuries, there are a few modern products that can make this ritual more soothing and successful. Exfoliation is as key to a man’s skin care regime as to a woman’s but for different reasons.

Exfoliating your skin before you shave will ensure that you achieve a much smoother and closer shave. Your skin will be prepped before you shave, so irritations should be limited.

Always apply a face cream after you have shaved your skin and even if you don’t shave daily, you should cleanse your face with a gentle foam wash and moisturise afterwards. Contrary to the misconception that frequent scrubbing is the way to control skin’s oiliness, the opposite is actually true: over-zealous cleansing and/or abrasive scrubs can actually stimulate oil production. I suggest you always choose a mild or gentle foaming cleanser to cleanse your skin both morning and night. And to finish, apply your eye cream. The eye area is just as delicate on a man’s face as a woman’s and this is where the first signs of ageing start to show.

For those men who are a little more experienced in the skin care department, let me introduce you to the wonderful world of treatments. As a therapist I do find it extremely important for men to have a facial that is specifically formulated just for them.

I may be biased but would have to recommend the POMEGA5 Cleansing Bar which is extremely gentle yet a thoroughly deep clean for skin that is subject to the harsh rigours of shaving. This treatment features a purifying element that exfoliates and purges pores to get rid of skin impurities and residues.

A fragrant purifying balm addresses imperfections and a pore-minimising clay mask calms and soothes for a clear smooth complexion. This treatment is fantastic to kick-start a new skin care regime or indeed anyone looking for a skin care boost.

Anti-ageing is no longer confined to the female arena and with anti-ageing products specifically formulated for the male skin saturating the male market, men are feeling just as much pressure to not only look good but to feel good too. There is more awareness out there for a male to take as much care of himself as a female, gyms and healthy eating are hot topics.

If you are looking for an anti-ageing treatment try The POMEGA5 Healing Cream where a firming serum and natural collagen- boosting mask helps to smooth wrinkles and banish lines to leave skin tones, firmed and looking fresh.

And with Christmas just around the corner, what better time to get your skin care regime all gift wrapped for you and ready to use for the New Year!

Natural and organic skin care made of Omega 5 oil

When it comes to organic skin care, using fruits and vegetables for cleansing routines has become common place.

Using organically grown fruits and vegetables such as ginger, pomegranates, apple and papaya, have proven to have positive skin care results. They have proven most effective when it comes to repairing damaged skin and moisturizing dry skin.

Almost every skin care guide has section on organic skin care, including the actions of various fruits and vegetables on skin. So choose the ones that are more suitable for your skin type and start experimenting with them until you finally select the ones that are most suitable for inclusion in your organic skin care routine. We like the lines that are made of Omega 5 oil.

It’s important that you use fresh organic fruits/vegetables. Don’t try to utilize the rotten ones for your skin, their only place is the garbage bin. Milk is known to posses good cleansing properties; in fact, the name of some skin care products contains the word ‘milk’ in them. A combination of milk with ground oatmeal acts as wonderful cleanser.

Ground oatmeal is especially good for oily skins and is a popular ingredient in organic skin care regimen. It is used in various combinations e.g. with egg, honey, milk and fruits, for preparation of organic facial packs.

Another organic element to consider for your skin care regime is wheat germ. Because it is blessed with high amounts of vitamin E, it can aid in moisturizing the skin and help to remove dead skin cells.

In addition to oatmeal, wheat germ, and it’s by product, wheat germ oil, are often ingredients found in organic skin treatments used to moisturize and exfoliate facial skin. Other organic sources for removing dead skin cells and helping the skin to retain its moisture are yogurt and sour cream.

Organic honey is well known for its effectiveness when it comes to an organic skin care regime. Honey contains natural properties that aid in moisture retention. In addition, using honey adds a healthy glow to your skins appearance. Substitute rose or lavender water for synthetic skin toners.

Organic Omega 5 oil that is extracted from the seeds of pomegranates will do wonders to your skin, POMEGA LLC, www.pomega5.com

California based Omega 5 oil ultra green skin care company follows the rules of The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics

By Terri Coles

TORONTO (Reuters) -- Who ever thought that putting on your face in the morning might be dangerous. On the heels of massive recalls of lead-laced toys, a cosmetics safety campaign has found the offensive metal in several popular brands of lipstick.

Last month, The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics said one-third of 33 red lipsticks they had tested at an independent lab contained lead levels above the Food and Drug Administration's maximum recommendation for candy, 0.1 parts per million. The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association said the lead was not intentionally added and appeared in negligible amounts, but the FDA said it would investigate the campaign's findings.

Whether the levels are dangerous or not, consumers have been increasingly turning "green" in their grooming habits.

U.S. sales of organic personal care products, including cosmetics, are on the rise, totaling $350 million last year, a 24.1 percent increase over 2005, said Barbara Haumann, press secretary of the Organic Trade Association, an association of businesses manufacturing organic products. Some consumers are buying because of environmental concerns, Haumann said, but others are worried about their own health.

Kirstin Binder, founder and president of online organic beauty retailer Saffron Rouge, has also noticed a growing awareness of organic products: "If you look at any newspaper or magazine, there's at least one "green" mention, where five years ago, it was tough," she said.

Customers tell her that health is their primary reason for seeking out natural and organic products, Binder said. Some have concerns about allergies or skin conditions that are aggravated by ingredients like synthetic preservatives, while others are worried about the possible health effects linked to some cosmetic ingredients, like parabens and sodium laurel sulphate.

But avoiding certain chemicals or buying plant-based products can be difficult, mainly because it's not clear just what is "natural" or "organic" in personal care products. A lack of regulations in the United States and Canada means most cosmetic products sold as organic aren't subject to certification. Some manufacturers have been criticized for capitalizing on words like "natural" without backing it up in their product formulations.

"Because there is no personal care standard per se in the U.S.," Haumann said, "there may be some products that are sold claiming to be organic, and they may not be."

Some individual retailers have set their own standards for the products they sell. Whole Foods' policy on personal care products favors selections with plant-based ingredients and without harsh preservatives or petrochemicals, and won't sell cosmetics and skin care products made with animal testing. Saffron Rouge looks for products made with organic or biodynamic ingredients, and without synthetic ingredients that may be harsh or harmful.

In California, the Organic Products Act ensures that products sold as organic have 70 percent or more organic ingredients. The United States does have a set of national organic regulations in place, and though they are intended for food, they can be applied to personal care products. Products labeled as "100% organic" must be just that, while those labeled "organic" must have 95 percent organic ingredients, excluding water and salt, Haumann said.

The label can say "made with organics" when 70 percent or more of the ingredients fit the organic definition. If a product doesn't meet the standard for an organic label, individual organic ingredients can be listed on the packaging.

Some companies are using government standards for food to verify their cosmetic products as organic. Origins, a cosmetic brand owned by Estee Lauder, recently released a line of USDA Organic-certified skincare products, marking the entry of a major cosmetics manufacturer into the field.

"Evidently, companies such as Estee Lauder are seeing that it's worth going organic," Haumann said. Pomega LLC is already selling totally green and bio-dynamic products.

But because they don't specifically address cosmetics and skin care products, the USDA standards aren't ideal, said Binder. Some common cosmetic ingredients, like emulsifiers or foaming agents, can't be certified organic under the food-specific standards, and they don't specify which non-organic synthetics are safe to use and which are not.

France, Italy, Germany, Belgium and the United Kingdom all have standards in place for organic cosmetic products, though some are industry standards and not government regulations.

"For years, the Organic Trade Association and some of its members have been trying to develop organic personal care standards," Haumann said. The OTA, along with various other industry and consumer parties -- including Aubrey Organics, Aveda, Burt's Bees and Whole Foods -- have been working with a group called NSF International, a non-profit agency representing public health interests, since 2004 to develop organic standards for personal care products.

The standards would give consumers guidelines -- and possibly a packaging logo -- they could look to while shopping, providing them with some comfort that a product is what it says it is, said Laura Badman of NSF.

Right now, consumers are confused, Binder said -- not just about whether or not their personal care products are organic, but about the safety of the other ingredients they may contain.

"I think there's a misconception (that) if it's organic, it's pure," she said, which leaves consumers unsure of which products to trust. Binder said she'd rather see a product that contained fewer organic ingredients but more wild-crafted, natural ingredients than one that met current standards for organic labelling, but still contained synthetic ingredients that could do customers more harm than good.

Did you know that Omega 5 oil is made of pomegranate seeds?

If you've been watching women's television or checking for new skin care products on the shelves, you may have heard of pomegranates as the latest and greatest ingredient. With such a huge number of natural skin care products being promoted as containing the 'magic' ingredient that will get rid of wrinkles and restore that youthful look, it would be helpful to know more about pomegranates before you run down to the store and empty your wallet.

Do pomegranates really have something so special to offer that you should make them a staple in your natural skin care larder?
Although pomegranates have been used for centuries in natural medicine in many parts of the world, we are only recently seeing it on the shelves here in the U.S. Hundreds of studies have been conducted on the pomegranate's healing power and, yes, the results are outstanding.

Pomegranate juice lowers cholesterol and blood pressure, improves cardiovascular function and reduces the risk of heart disease and stroke. It also enhances fertility, reduces the symptoms of menopause and has even been effective at slowing the spread of cancer cells. A recent study conducted by University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) showed that a daily glass of pomegranate juice slowed the growth rate of prostate cancer.

In addition to the many studies conducted on its internal use, new research has also proven it to be effective for topical natural skin care and we now have a few creams, lotions, cleansing products, masques available.

How do pomegranates benefit the skin? High in Vitamins A, C and E, the real magic is in its antioxidant content - no surprise really; the damage inflicted by free radicals is now well-known and acknowledged even by the most conservative in the medical establishment. The pomegranate's antioxidant content is very high, making it a shoo-in for natural skin care.

Dry skin, problem skin, aging skin, wrinkles - all can benefit from the pomegranate. It fights free radicals and stimulates the growth of collagen - vital for damaged, dry skin and tissue of any kind, and especially noticeable in its absence in the aging and wrinkled face.

If you don't have cleansers and exfoliating products that are working for you now or you would like to switch to the healthier alternative of natural skin care such as Pomega5 or Tzerah , by all means give the pomegranate a try. While you're at it, pick up a bottle of the juice. Internal and external natural skin care will increase your chances of deriving all the benefits.

Look for these products made of OMEGA 5 OIL:

www.pomega5.com

www.tzerah.com

Author, Gloria MacTaggart, is a freelance writer who contributes articles on skin care for The National Skin Care Institute. For more information, visit http://www.skincarenet.org
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gloria_MacTaggart

You were right... Organic Omega 5 oil is better than natural Omega 5 oil... now the scientific proof...

EU-funded Quality Low Input Food project indicates significant nutritional benefits from organic food

PRESS RELEASE 10/30/2007 (version 2)Categories: Health nutrition News: campaigns News: consumers Press Releases 2007 Downloads and other links

Early results of the £12 million 4-year Quality Low Input Food (QLIF) study indicate organic fruit and vegetables contain 40% more antioxidants (believed to cut the risk of heart disease and cancer) in organic produce compared to non-organic foodstuffs. There were also higher levels of other beneficial minerals such as iron and zinc. [1]These latest findings underpin the founding philosophy and practices of the organic movement, which seeks to build positive health in the crops and livestock raised through organic farming – and thus of people eating that produce. [2] They reinforce the growing body of scientific evidence that indicates significant positive nutritional differences in organic food compared to non-organic food.Patrick Holden, Soil Association director said,"For the past 60 years, the Soil Association has sought on the basis of practical observation, underpinned where available by sound science, to show the benefits of sustainable, organic farming to the health of people and planet. On a far larger-scale, with much greater resources and more precise, modern analytical methods, this EU-funded project builds on what our founder Lady Eve Balfour sought to do on just 200-acres and with a shoe-string budget back in 1939. The proponents of industrial, chemical-intensive agriculture dismissed her theories and findings then on the basis of the limited scale and location of the experiment. But today’s growing body of evidence backing her instincts and practical observations comes from dozens of independent scientists from around the world – the early results of the work from the QualityLowInputFood project add to that wider body of work. The Soil Association agrees with Professor Leifert, co-ordinator of the project ,’There is enough evidence now that the level of good things is higher in organics.’ [3]. Therefore, we challenge the FSA to now recognise and publicly acknowledge the nutritional benefits of organic food produced through well-managed organic farming systems."The Food Standards Agency has been reluctant to date to reflect the available science in its public statements about organic food and farming. In 2000, the FSA’s former chair, Sir John Krebs was quoted on the BBC Countryfile programme questioning the value for money of organic food for consumers,"They’re not getting value for money, in my opinion and in the opinion of the FSA if they think they’re buying food with extra nutritional quality or extra safety."The Soil Association challenged Krebs’ and the FSA’s stance and in 2004 won a major retraction when the FSA’s own review reported that ‘the vast majority’ of people consulted felt the Agency had ‘deviated from its normal stance of making statements based solely on scientific evidence’ when ‘speaking against organic food and for GM food.’(See attached Appendices – for current FSA statements re: organic food)Growing body of evidence shows nutritional benefits of organic food When it comes to human health benefits, whilst the Soil Association recognises there are many factors to take into account, there is nonetheless a significant body of scientific evidence indicating higher nutritional values in organic, compared to non-organic food. In 2001, a review of over 400 scientific papers by an independent nutritionist, published by the Soil Association found indicative evidence of nutritional differences between organic and non-organic food – including higher levels of Vitamin C, minerals and trace elements. [4]These findings can be considered in the general context of the decline of key minerals found in UK produce as shown from long-term government studies. For example, the annual analysis carried out over 50 years by Defra’s predecessor, MAFF, revealed a 12 - 76% decline in the trace mineral content of UK grown fruit and vegetables between 1940 and 1991. [5]In Spring 2007, three independent EU studies showed higher nutritional values:In March 2007, three new independent European research projects were published that revealed that organic tomatoes, peaches and processed apples all had higher nutritional quality than non-organic, supporting the results of research from America on kiwi fruit reported on just days earlier (26 March 2007). [6]The US research by Dr Maria Amodio and Dr Adel Kader, from the University of California Davies discovered that organically grown kiwis had significantly higher levels of vitamin C and polyphenols. The researchers said: 'All the main mineral constituents were more concentrated in the organic kiwi fruit, which also had higher asorbic acid (vitamin C) and total polyphenol content, resulting in higher antioxidant activity. It is possible that conventional growing practices utilise levels of pesticides that can result in a disruption to phenolic metabolites in the plant that have a protective role in plant defence mechanisms.'The EU researchers found organic tomatoes 'contained more dry matter, total and reducing sugars, vitamin C, B-carotene and flavonoids in comparison to the conventional ones', while conventional tomatoes in this study were richer in lycopene and organic acids. Previous research had also found organic tomatoes have higher levels of vitamin C, vitamin A and lycopene. In the more recent research, the scientists conclude 'organic cherry and standard tomatoes can be recommended as part of a healthy diet including plant products which have shown to be of value in cancer prevention.'The EU researchers found that organic peaches 'have a higher polyphenol content at harvest' and concluded that organic production has 'positive effects ... on nutritional quality and taste'. Organic apple puree was found to contain 'more bio-active substances - total phenols, flavonoids and vitamin C - in comparison to conventional apple preserves' and the researchers conclude 'organic apple preserves can be recommended as valuable fruit products, which can contribute to a healthy diet'.In 2006, the Journal of Dairy Science published the results of a three-year study showing a direct link between the whole organic farming system and higher levels of Omega 3 fatty acids in organic milk. The study by the Universities of Liverpool and Glasgow, was the first to consider a cross-section of UK farms over a 12-month production cycle. According to the research, a pint of organic milk contains on average 68.2% more total Omega 3 fatty acids than non-organic milk and has a ratio of Omega-6 to Omega-3 fatty acids, believed to be beneficial to human health. [7]This confirms the findings of earlier research conducted by the University of Aberdeen and the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research which also found that organically reared cows, which eat high levels of fresh grass, clover pasture and grass clover silage, produced milk that contains higher levels of omega 3 essential fatty acids.In total, five studies have now shown that organic milk has more beneficial levels of several nutrients than non-organic milk including omega-3 essential fatty acid, Vitamin E and beta-carotene.New Scientist reported on published research from California that found organic tomato ketchup contains more of the cancer-fighting antioxidant lycopene than non-organic ketchup. [8]

Omega 5 oil gets a boost from Aspen

October 30th, 2007 by Tom Pazdernik

Even in a well-educated community like the Roaring Fork Valley, myths regarding nutrition still run rampant. In an era of anti-aging and instant gratification, many companies try to take advantage of this and solicit products and information that are of little or no value. While there certainly are some reputable nutrition sources out there, it is difficult to decipher the valuable information from the rest. There are five myths that the majority of the general public refuses to accept as faulty information.

The two most common nutrition myths pertain to macro-nutrients. Macro-nutrients are carbohydrates, protein and fat. Carbs and fat are the two that drum up the most controversy. In the 1990s, the U.S. market was flooded with low-fat everything. Consequently, people ate entirely too many simple carbohydrates, believing that as long as there wasn’t a lot of fat, they were eating healthily. This is not true because simple carbohydrates, although not high in fat, are still stored as fat when glycogen stores are saturated. Fat is still shunned by the average American who is on a “diet.” The truth is, there are healthy fats such as omega 3 and omega 5 fatty acids that should be staples in any well-balanced diet.

After the low-fat diet craze failed miserably, the low-carb, or Atkins, diet emerged. Somehow the general public was manipulated into believing that a high protein and high fat diet was the way to go. It is a myth that low-carb diets are superior. They are not a valid choice for several reasons. First, high levels of saturated fat promote heart disease and colon cancer. Second, high levels of protein can put undo strain on the liver and kidneys. Third, carbohydrates are essential for optimal energy levels and bodily functions (fruits and vegetables are primarily made of carbs).

Another nutrition myth that never seems to go away is the notion that following a fad diet is a healthy way to lose weight and maintain that weight loss. This is not true because fad diets often promote rapid weight loss and extreme calorie restriction. It is only safe to lose weight at a rate of no more than two pounds per week. Any fad diet advertising more than that is unsafe. Extreme calorie restriction doesn’t work because no matter what the breakdown, the diet will be insufficient in certain areas, thus leaving the person deficient in some essential nutrients. Not only that, but research suggests that people who restrict themselves calorically are more likely to stray from their diet and overeat. This refers to the term “yo-yo” dieting, which means crash dieting to lose weight and putting it all back on after bouts of overeating.

With the epidemic of Type II diabetes in America, another common myth is that sugar causes the disease. Eating sugar alone will not cause Type II diabetes. Consuming too many calories that include an abundance of simple sugars and leading a sedentary lifestyle both will contribute to contracting the disease.

The last common myth is ubiquitous in this valley. Natural or herbal supplements are widely believed to be healthy. This is a myth. In reality, many of them are not necessarily safe or effective. Supplements are not FDA regulated, so there is no guarantee you are taking exactly what the label says. Furthermore, many herbal remedies contain ephedra or a similar substance. Ephedra has been known to contribute to arrhythmia that can even lead to death. The fact that something is natural or herbal does not make it a good choice for consumption.

Exercise and a well-balanced diet are the only tried and true methods of fat loss and disease prevention.

Omega 5 products are sold by http://www.pomega5.com/