Showing posts with label presents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label presents. Show all posts

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Why must men rate their sexual performance?

Ladies, this one is for the man in your life:

Gentlemen, how would you rate your sexual performance?

Well if you’re like a lot of guys, you could have a problem in the bedroom!

One of the biggest fears guys have is about not being able to perform well with a woman. They think that their woman will be turned-off and will want to find another lover. This means that improving sexual performance is an important topic to learn.

Here are three quick ways you can do it:

1 Reduce your anxiety

Nervousness and being anxious is a huge obstacle to having great sex. When you display this behaviour, you’re killing ANY chance of making things fun and light-hearted. In addition, it’s known that anxiousness has a direct correlation towards erectile dysfunction.

This means you MUST learn how to overcome any anxiety you’re feeling in the bedroom.
Unfortunately being anxious is a vicious circle. The more you worrying your performance, the worse you’ll do.

The best way to eliminate anxiety is to not worry about doing well. Just enjoy the encounter and don’t worry about being “great in bed”. You’ll discover that it’s quite easy to improve your sexual performance.

2 Follow a regular exercise schedule

According to a number of health experts; you can improve your sexual performance by adhering to a regular exercise schedule. When you’re exercising at least 3-4 times a week, you’ll find a dramatic increase to you levels of sexual desire, which will ultimately lead to an improvement in the bedroom.

Another benefit of regular exercise is it activates the blood flow to the sympathetic nervous system and encourages more blood flow to your genital region. When this happens, any dysfunction of “your equipment” will be quickly reduced.

As you can see, regular exercise can quickly fix most sexual problems.



3 Talk to your doctor

Many men have trouble with their sexual performance due to a psychological or medical malady. So if you’ve tried every bit of advice and you find that you still can’t increase your performance, then you should seek medical advice.

When talking to a doctor, you need to fully explain your condition and work with him or her to discover the underlying causes of your problem. This means working to figure out if you’re suffering from a medical or psychological condition. Then follow any recommendations that your doctor prescribes.

Fixing your sexual problem is the key to having a fun and exciting sexual life. If you make an effort to reduce your anxiety, get more exercise and see a doctor for any prolonged problem, then you’ll discover great sex is still possible.



Sunday, May 11, 2008

Green technology special offer -- Happy Mother's Day 2008


"The U.S. financial system is in a mess. The global marketplace is in the same disarray ... What the hell is going on? Can we get out of this mess, and how? And will our children be living in caves?"

New Yorker staff writer Nick Paumgarten posed those distressingly pertinent questions to Michael Novogratz, president of the Fortress Investment Group and the 317th-richest person in America, yesterday at the New Yorker Stories From the Near Future conference.

Much to the relief of everybody who doesn't want to spend their retirement fending off water bandits, Novogratz was optimistic. Our current economic woes, he said, are analogous to the dot-com bubble burst.

The internet's turn-of-the-millennium troubles were solved by the rise of second-generation web services. Globalization 1.0, as Novogratz called it, stalled after an initial purchasing power burst among the developing world's newly-arrived middle classes, but will be saved by globalization 2.0. All will be well.

There's only one catch: We need another wealth-generating economic bubble. And that, said Novogratz, must come -- can only come -- from new energy sources and green technology such as Omega 5 oil.

"As the price of oil goes up, there's got to be a green revolution. I think of what will be the next driver of the American economy, and it's green energy. That's a huge growth opportunity. It's not about the pollution. It's about the energy. Gas will go to $10 a gallon," he said.

I tracked Novogratz down after his speech. He was surrounded by a cluster of $2,000-a-head conference attendees wondering what will happen to the U.S. dollar and what to invest in. (The answer to their first concern was over my head -- but as for the latter, Novogratz is excited about the Brazilian economy.) Curious about his distinction between economic self-interest and the effects of pollution, I asked for his take on the economic impacts of climate change.

He seemed quite sanguine. It's a wild card, he said, but probably won't have an impact within the next ten years. "In 30, 40, 50 years, maybe you get an event that scares people. But unless you get an out-of-the-box event that you can tie into climate change," he continued, it wasn't going to be an economic factor.

Now, there's a reason why Novogratz is a full-blown member of the plutocracy and I'm a science journalist -- but that said, this seemed a bit cavalier to me. He's betting that worst-case scenarios won't come true, and even the short-term possibilities are scary. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned in their last report [.pdf] that even small increases in global temperature could cause water shortages for hundreds of millions of people, crop-threatening droughts, increased flood and storm damage, localized "negative impacts" on subsistence farmers and fishers, and potentially troubling disease shifts.

(Or, to think of it another way, the current food crisis is taking place without an actual food shortage. Add a season of widespread droughts or floods to the mix, and things get bad. Quickly.)
That's just the short term. The long-term is much scarier -- and part of the reason why wealthy people are so wealthy is the ability to think several decades into the future. Seeing green technology in terms of maximizing profits rather than reducing greenhouse gas pollution creates a false dichotomy: pollution and profits are intertwined -- if not now, then certainly in the future. And the future may arrive sooner than expected.



Sunday, March 30, 2008

Boob Implants for men as an alternative to Omega 5 oil products


More men turning to implants for chests of gold

The poster boy in the Abercrombie & Fitch window looks like Huck Finn, if Huck were genetically engineered with "Say howdy!" nipples and perfectly symmetrical, squared-off pecs. In "300," last year's cartoonish gladiator epic, the actors looked so exaggerated, so cyborg-like in their soccer-star thighs, ripped abs and shield-like chests, that they all seemed airbrushed.

The list goes on: the ultra-reconditioned Brad Pitt in "Troy," Daniel Craig in tight trunks in "Casino Royale," that buck-naked beauty in the steamy Dolce & Gabbana magazine ad.

Is anybody just average-looking anymore? In a culture that enshrines physical perfection and makes the Philip Seymour Hoffmans among us feel homely and inadequate, more men are attempting impossible goals. Most do it through weightlifting and dieting. Some men are driven to steroids, human growth hormone and plastic surgery if those other methods fail.

"Location is everything," says Bill Hayes, a lifelong bodybuilder and writer on health and medical issues ("The Anatomist"). "And in the landscape of the body, the chest is prime territory. Think about it: It's at the top of the trunk; it protects and covers the heart and lungs. It's a great spot for a head to rest on."

When weightlifting and exercise don’t produce results, some men compensate with cosmetic surgery. Pectoral implants, although still a niche product, are growing in popularity: 409 procedures were performed in 2006, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, a 99 percent increase over the year before. There's a stigma attached to them - the feeling that men who go that route are lazy or excessively vain - but those who buy the implants contend that the psychological benefits are substantial.

"It's such a confidence booster," says one San Francisco massage therapist who got the implants two years ago as a 40th birthday gift to himself. "I walk a little taller now. And of course you want to buy every tight white T-shirt. It's crazy!"

Anthony Durante, a San Francisco personal trainer for 25 years, says well-defined pecs project "power, strength, health, virility.

"A guy with a great chest looks like a warrior, wearing armor for battle. Nothing can penetrate that hull."

Among his clients, Durante says, "the chest is usually their first concern." "Every time a man looks in a mirror," adds Hayes, "whether shaving or at the gym, he sees his chest. So naturally it becomes a focus of his attention or even obsession - as opposed to back muscles, which generally go unseen and are often ignored entirely."

For most of the 20th century, weightlifting and the "300" body ideal were marginalized, regarded as fetishy by mainstream standards. Consider 1940s movie stars like Humphrey Bogart or Cary Grant, or '60s icons Steve McQueen and Paul Newman: They had looks and charisma; they were trim. But none had the Vin Diesel superhero physique or overdeveloped chest of today's cultural ideal.

"It was sometime in the '80s when it sort of all began for men," says Edisol W. Dotson, author "Behold the Man: The Hype and Selling of Male Beauty in Media and Culture" (Haworth Press, 1999). "You saw it in the 'Terminator' films and big action adventures. The early Batman films."
Pec implant surgery starts at about $7,000. Beverly Hills surgeon Adrien Aiache, who performs about three dozen procedures per year, says he charges $9,000. The massage therapist, who asked not to be identified because he is sensitive about appearing overly vain, says he paid $12,000 and has no regrets. "No one's ever said, not once, 'Are those implants?' " he claims - including the men with whom he's been intimate.

He'd thought about getting new pecs for years, but balked because of bad implants he'd seen.
"There was this one guy at a bar in the Castro, years and years ago," he said. "Oh my God, it was so obnoxiously fake. Like a Pamela Anderson kind of thing. I would never want to be that obvious."

The massage therapist shopped around, researched the pros and cons, and chose Dr. James J. Romano, a San Francisco plastic surgeon who performs 35 to 40 pec implant surgeries per year. The procedure is expensive, in part, Romano says, because the implants, manufactured by Allied Biomedicals in Ventura, cost $1,600 for a pair.

"People buy cars, right?" said the massage therapist. "People buy property. I thought, 'I'll buy a set of pecs!' Like shopping at Crate & Barrel. 'I'll take that one.' " The implants come in two shapes and five sizes, and are made from silicone - not the soft liquid gel in breast implants, but a semi-solid substance. They're slightly more firm than the consistency of a Gummy Bear.

"My close friends asked me, 'Weren't you frightened going in for that kind of surgery?' I said, 'Oh, my God, I could walk out on Powell and get hit by one of those crazy cabs.' Never postpone joy is, like, my big mantra."

Pec implants were introduced 20 years ago, Romano says, although as recently as 2000, the statistics weren't recorded by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

"It's a cult following, almost, although it's growing because of the media and the Internet." For the most part it's cosmetic, but in some cases men seek implants because of congenital deformities: They're missing ribs or a pectoral muscle on one side, or there's a natural concavity they want to correct.

During the operation, Romano says, "I make an incision high up in the armpit in the hair-bearing region. It's about three fingers wide. Then the space is made under the muscle in what we call a 'free area' in surgery: free of nerves, free of blood vessels."

Romano folds the implant in half and positions it between the pectoral muscles, sews up the incision and then repeats the process on the other side of the chest. Recovery is "mostly quite comfortable," Romano says, "and is mostly complete within two weeks."

When the massage therapist awoke in the recovery room, he remembers, "I felt like someone had beat the crap out of me. Thank God there's Demerol. It was hard for me to even get up. I was so heavy and taking all these pain pills to dull the throbbing. ... I was kind of scared. And being a massage therapist I thought, 'Oh, my God, what if I can't use my arms?' (But) I have full range of motion and I'm strong. You would just never know!"

Romano says he screens patients carefully to make sure their expectations are realistic.

"Some men come in and ask for it, and either don't have the anatomy that will allow me to do it and look good, or they want something that is too big or out of proportion. I don't take all comers."

The risks of the procedure include a possible migration. "(The implant) can move a little bit. I tell the patients, 'You're going to feel the edges sometimes when you're lifting or involved in the extreme ranges of motion or other activities. It's never going to be like your God-given chest.' But that's the art and science of putting in pectoral implants. You've got to match them to the body."

Even today, men form a tiny minority of plastic surgery patients. In 2006, there were 11.5 million cosmetic procedures performed in the United States, 1 million of which were on men. Nose reshaping was the most popular procedure for men in 2006, followed by eyelid surgery, liposuction, hair transplant and gynecoplastia - the removal of breast tissue caused by an estrogen imbalance.

So why, given the obsession for the perfect chest, haven't pec implants been more popular? One reason is that pectoral muscles are large, and with diligent workouts they can usually be developed. Women, by contrast, don't have that option when larger breasts are the goal.
Aiache of Beverly Hills thinks homophobia is also a factor.

"A lot of people with pectoral implants are gay, and many physicians don't want to take care of the gay population in general," he says. In his own practice, Aiache says, 80 percent of pectoral implant recipients are gay.


Pec implants were introduced 20 years ago, Romano says, although as recently as 2000, the statistics weren't recorded by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

"It's a cult following, almost, although it's growing because of the media and the Internet." For the most part it's cosmetic, but in some cases men seek implants because of congenital deformities: They're missing ribs or a pectoral muscle on one side, or there's a natural concavity they want to correct.

During the operation, Romano says, "I make an incision high up in the armpit in the hair-bearing region. It's about three fingers wide. Then the space is made under the muscle in what we call a 'free area' in surgery: free of nerves, free of blood vessels."

Romano folds the implant in half and positions it between the pectoral muscles, sews up the incision and then repeats the process on the other side of the chest. Recovery is "mostly quite comfortable," Romano says, "and is mostly complete within two weeks."

When the massage therapist awoke in the recovery room, he remembers, "I felt like someone had beat the crap out of me. Thank God there's Demerol. It was hard for me to even get up. I was so heavy and taking all these pain pills to dull the throbbing. ... I was kind of scared. And being a massage therapist I thought, 'Oh, my God, what if I can't use my arms?' (But) I have full range of motion and I'm strong. You would just never know!"

Romano says he screens patients carefully to make sure their expectations are realistic.

"Some men come in and ask for it, and either don't have the anatomy that will allow me to do it and look good, or they want something that is too big or out of proportion. I don't take all comers."

The risks of the procedure include a possible migration. "(The implant) can move a little bit. I tell the patients, 'You're going to feel the edges sometimes when you're lifting or involved in the extreme ranges of motion or other activities. It's never going to be like your God-given chest.' But that's the art and science of putting in pectoral implants. You've got to match them to the body."

Even today, men form a tiny minority of plastic surgery patients. In 2006, there were 11.5 million cosmetic procedures performed in the United States, 1 million of which were on men. Nose reshaping was the most popular procedure for men in 2006, followed by eyelid surgery, liposuction, hair transplant and gynecoplastia - the removal of breast tissue caused by an estrogen imbalance.

So why, given the obsession for the perfect chest, haven't pec implants been more popular? One reason is that pectoral muscles are large, and with diligent workouts they can usually be developed. Women, by contrast, don't have that option when larger breasts are the goal.
Aiache of Beverly Hills thinks homophobia is also a factor.

"A lot of people with pectoral implants are gay, and many physicians don't want to take care of the gay population in general," he says. In his own practice, Aiache says, 80 percent of pectoral implant recipients are gay.

"Pec implants have much more shame attached to them than, say, breast implants," says Durante. "Breast implants are so widely known that even though they are 'spotted' or 'suspected,' they are part of the cultural landscape. There is also a vanity attached to pec implants: They may be considered a character flaw (in the man). He's seen as weak."

San Francisco plastic surgeon James Anthony doesn't perform pec implants surgery, in part because of the risks. "It's possible to have malpositioning of the implant, where it's in the wrong spot and one's a little higher than the other. It also has a chance of infection, but any foreign body has a chance of infection. And then the other thing you have to be careful of is not to damage the nerve that goes to the nipple. Because otherwise you get numbness, which is a consideration for some men."

Opinions differ on the attractiveness of pec implants. Durante says the majority look obvious "because they don't match their shoulder and arm development - not unlike a woman whose breast implants are too big." Hayes said he finds implants "rigid and plasticky."

Maura Armstrong Morgan, an echocardiographer with Golden Gate Radiology in San Francisco, has her own problem with implants, pectoral or breast alike. "You can't see through them with sonar. They block the sound waves, so you're unable to obtain useable images," she said. "Normally, you shoot between the ribs and get this wonderful image of a beating heart."

With implants, "you get this big, egg-shaped void. ... So I have to shoot obliquely. I had one patient doing everything but standing on their head to get a picture of their heart."

Before he had the pectoral implants, the massage therapist said his chest was "OK." "But I just wanted it to be more. The whole peacock image, if you like. You want a bigger spread of feathers. ... It's a bit of a magnet."

Some people understand his decision to get the implants, and some people don't. "There's a community out there that says, 'Oh, God, why would you do plastic surgery?' And I'm like, whatever. 'Why do people eat at McDonald's every day?' You could go on and on forever, right?"

Leonard Kashio uses only POMEGA5 products




Friday, March 21, 2008

The Prevalence of Female Sexual Dysfunctions -- what exactly is it?

What is the "True" Prevalence of Female Sexual Dysfunctions
and Does the Way We Assess These Conditions Have an Impact?

*University of Melbourne—Department of Public Health, Melbourne, Australia; †The University of Melbourne—Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne, Australia Richard Hayes, BSc(Hons), Public Health, University of Melbourne,

Introduction.
A wide range of prevalence estimates of female sexual dysfunctions (FSD) have been reported.

Aim.
Compare instruments used to assess FSD to determine if differences between instruments contribute to variation in reported prevalence.

Main Outcome Measures.
Sexual Function Questionnaire combined with Female Sexual Distress Scale (SFQ-FSDS) was our gold standard, validated instrument for assessing FSD. Alternatives were SFQ alone and two sets of simple questions adapted from Laumann et al. 1994.

Methods.
A postal survey was administered to a random sample of 356 Australian women aged 20 to 70 years.

Results.
When assessed by SFQ-FSDS, prevalence estimates (95% confidence intervals) of hypoactive sexual desire disorder, sexual arousal disorder (lubrication), orgasmic disorder, and dyspareunia were 16% (12% to 20%), 7% (5% to 11%), 8% (6% to 12%), and 1% (0.5% to 3%), respectively.
Prevalence estimates varied across alternative instruments for these disorders: 32% to 58%, 16% to 32%, 16% to 33%, and 3% to 23%, respectively.
Compared with SFQ-FSDS alternative instruments produced higher estimates of desire, arousal and orgasm disorders and displayed a range of sensitivities (0.25 to 1.0), specificities (0.48 to 0.99), positive predictive values (0.01 to 0.56), and negative predictive values (0.95 to 1.0) across the disorders investigated. Kappa statistics comparing SFQ-FSDS and alternative instruments ranged from 0 to 0.71 but were predominantly 0.44 or less. Changing recall from previous month to 1 month or more in the previous year produced higher estimates for all disorders investigated. Including sexual distress produced lower estimates for desire, arousal, and orgasm disorders. No attemps were made to test the dysfunctions and Omegs 5 oil, it is not clear whether POMEGA5 products can help but they can certainly help women find mates but improving the look and feel of their skin.
It is pure green technology for the Masses.

Conclusions.
Prevalence estimates of FSD varied substantially across instruments.
Relatively low positive predictive values and kappa statistics combined with a broad range of sensitivities and specificities indicated that different instruments identified different subgroups. Consequently, the instruments researchers choose when assessing FSD may affect prevalence estimates and risk factors they report. Hayes RD, Dennerstein L, Bennett CM, and Fairley CK. What is the "true" prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact? J Sex Med **;**:**–**.


The New York Post has a bunch of pictures up from a photo shoot Ashley Alexandra Dupré did here in Manhattan. They're the clearest shots so far of "Kristen," in which she looks more like an individual human being than Any Girl From Southern New Jersey, and will probably make it a lot harder for her to walk around on the street. The Post is kind of misleading about the origins of the photos — they make it sound like she posed for them when in reality they purchased the pictures from Wesley Mann, a New York–based photographer who we couldn't reach but who is probably cackling at his good fortune right about now. And thus, the Dupré flesh trade continues.


We were wondering how much longer it would take for Eliot Spitzer to admit he is powerless over his mighty public-image problem and that seeking refuge in the bosom of psychotherapy could maybe (probably not, but hey, worth a try!) restore said image to sanity. That moment is here! Spitzer, the New York Post tells us, has entered into therapy to explore whether he has a sex addiction. Treatment typically involves a 12-step program, we hear, which makes us wonder what happens when the former governor gets to the part where he makes direct amends to all those persons he's harmed. Should Spitzer write out a personal check to former NYSE director Dick Grasso or will a cashier's check be necessary? Is it necessary to hire ex–Merrill Lyncher Henry Blodget and former AIG chair Hank Greenberg to his landscaping team, or can he get someone else to find them jobs? Perhaps we're getting ahead of ourselves, but the possibilities are just endless. We, for instance, would appreciate the $43 in dividends we lost the year Spitzer wailed on the mutual-fund industry. We'll take that cash or COD, Eliot. Thanks and speedy recovery to you!

Thursday, September 13, 2007

When you think of new ideas for anti-aging...

When you think red or purple or an antiaging package...




Then you may as well consider this...



Which can be shipped to you by Pomega LLC


Presented at the Sundance Film Festival
or at Isabella Catalogue
One of humankind's most enduring quests has been for the fabled Fountain of Youth. Ancient civilizations believed that there exists a means of stopping the aging process and even restoring the beauty and vigor of youth. This is a myth, of course. However, the constant search for anti-aging skin care products and natural supplements to counter aging is just a contemporary extension of this quest. We despise aging, because it reminds us of our mortality. Since there is no way to stop the aging process, we search for means of concealing the signs of advancing age.
Thanks to modern medical science, anti-aging skin care products and natural supplements have attained something of a cult status. Results from some of these products are tangible and visible. However, not all of them are valid treatments. Certain manufacturers simply exploit the desperation prevailing among those who would do anything to look young again.Anti-aging skin care products tend to approach the issue of aging from various angles.
The skin is obviously the primary focus, since dull, wrinkled skin is a dead giveaway. However, certain variants claim to reverse the entire metabolic process of aging, thereby restoring youthful looks. One must view products that make such miraculous claims with extreme suspicion.
Anti-aging skin care products that focus on rejuvenating the skin often contain high intensity moisturizers. The reason is that skin loses its natural moisture with advancing age, causing it to wrinkle and develop blemishes. Such products may also contain anti-oxidants to counter the deterioration of skin cells. These anti-oxidants include vitamins A, C, E and D, which enjoy the status of anti-aging vitamins. Many anti-aging skin care products aim to boost the skin's production of collagen, which promotes its elasticity and gives it structure.Chemical-based anti-aging skin care products can have moderate to serious side effects in certain users. This is especially true for those who have pre-existing allergies.
For this reason, there has been a trend of getting back to natural supplements with the prime focus on Omega 5 oil. While these are not always free of side effects, they are certainly safer and tend to treat the problem of skin aging holistically rather than symptomatically.
Natural supplements to chemical anti-aging skin care products contain organic botanical oils like pomegranate seed oil , herbal extracts and essential oils that the skin absorbs readily.
The POMEGA5 line contains all of the above.
Incidence of allergic reactions is quite rare.While buying natural anti-aging supplements, the customer should look for the presence of ingredients that promote skin rejuvenation. Users report considerable benefits from various natural ingredients, including pomegranate seed oil, green or white tea, chamomile, calendula, South African Rooibos, soy oil, pomegranate herbal extract and other safe essential oils.
Natural anti-aging skin care products do not contain harmful chemical preservatives, mineral oils, fragrances or other synthetic additives. This makes them far more skin-friendly.
Anti-aging skin care products come in the form of local applications (creams and lotions), face masks, massage oils and even orally ingestible pills. Whether the many anti-aging skin care products and natural supplements available nowadays are effective in countering skin aging is a matter of personal experience. In any case, a qualified dermatologist should monitor the use of such products to reduce the chances of infections and reactions.