Monday, March 31, 2008

Can Casual Sex Between Consenting Adults Become Sexual Harassment?


Court ruling on sexual harassment causes quite a stir - and disagreement

'Managers who have affairs within the company will be considered criminals'

Last week's precedent setting ruling by the National Labor Court, stating that casual sex between an employer and employee is considered sexual harassment, was certainly the hot topic at most workplaces - and has raised quite a bit of disagreement among experts on labor relations.
The three national labor tribunal judges reversed a decision of the Haifa Labor Court in a suit filed by a 43-year-old software engineer against her employer.
She had had a six-month affair with one of her bosses, and was suing the company for compensation for sexual harassment after the affair ended. The regional tribunal ruled against her, but the higher court awarded her NIS 35,000 in compensation. Immediately after learning of the ruling, several high-tech companies notified their senior management of the matter. Off the record, many executives were quite worried about the implications of the decision. The ruling will "turn every company supervisor who has an affair in the workplace into a potential criminal," said one executive.

Attorney Nahum Feinberg, an expert in labor law and the head of one of Israel's largest law firms, expressed doubts about the decision. "The judges of the National [Labor] Court went to the limit, and even beyond it," he said. "A manger who has sexual relations with a subordinate has not necessarily committed sexual harassment, at least not in the case before us, where the employee came on to him."
The problem with the ruling is that the judges introduced moral issues into their decision, said Feinberg. "They are adults. True, they committed a serious disciplinary offense, certainly the supervisor," he said. While the workers may have violated their employer's trust, that is a long way from sexual harassment requiring compensation. He added that if the worker had not come on to her boss, he would have been able to live with the ruling. In fact, because she initiated the affair, the case could have been viewed as her giving a sexual bribe in return for preferred treatment, such as a promotion, said Feinberg.
"There were a lot of bad things here, but not sexual harassment," said Feinberg. However, he says the ruling is the National Labor Court's attempt to define it policy on the matter. Attorney Talia Livni, the president of Na'amat Israel, a woman's organization, views the matter rather differently. She praised the ruling, which she says clearly reflects the spirit of the law against sexual harassment.
"The importance of the law is that it serves as a warning for senior supervisors," said Livni. These senior executives can expect a harassment complaint if they abuse their position to have an intimate relationship with an employee, even if the employee is willing. Livni says further that the labor court intended for its ruling to apply not only to workplaces, but to other hierarchical organizations and frameworks such as universities.


"A lecturer could pursue sexual relations with a student. It is problematic for the student to refuse, so she agrees to it. Such a case is considered sexual harassment on the part of the lecturer," explained Livni. She said that managers and supervisors now must choose whether to have sexual relations only with those employees who are not subordinates.
They must understand that they must avoid such relations, even if they are entered into willingly, even at the initiative of the employee. Livni called on management to separate the workers in such cases.


We love Pomega5 products and do not have sex with our bosses

http://www.pomega5.com/

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Boob Implants for men as an alternative to Omega 5 oil products


More men turning to implants for chests of gold

The poster boy in the Abercrombie & Fitch window looks like Huck Finn, if Huck were genetically engineered with "Say howdy!" nipples and perfectly symmetrical, squared-off pecs. In "300," last year's cartoonish gladiator epic, the actors looked so exaggerated, so cyborg-like in their soccer-star thighs, ripped abs and shield-like chests, that they all seemed airbrushed.

The list goes on: the ultra-reconditioned Brad Pitt in "Troy," Daniel Craig in tight trunks in "Casino Royale," that buck-naked beauty in the steamy Dolce & Gabbana magazine ad.

Is anybody just average-looking anymore? In a culture that enshrines physical perfection and makes the Philip Seymour Hoffmans among us feel homely and inadequate, more men are attempting impossible goals. Most do it through weightlifting and dieting. Some men are driven to steroids, human growth hormone and plastic surgery if those other methods fail.

"Location is everything," says Bill Hayes, a lifelong bodybuilder and writer on health and medical issues ("The Anatomist"). "And in the landscape of the body, the chest is prime territory. Think about it: It's at the top of the trunk; it protects and covers the heart and lungs. It's a great spot for a head to rest on."

When weightlifting and exercise don’t produce results, some men compensate with cosmetic surgery. Pectoral implants, although still a niche product, are growing in popularity: 409 procedures were performed in 2006, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, a 99 percent increase over the year before. There's a stigma attached to them - the feeling that men who go that route are lazy or excessively vain - but those who buy the implants contend that the psychological benefits are substantial.

"It's such a confidence booster," says one San Francisco massage therapist who got the implants two years ago as a 40th birthday gift to himself. "I walk a little taller now. And of course you want to buy every tight white T-shirt. It's crazy!"

Anthony Durante, a San Francisco personal trainer for 25 years, says well-defined pecs project "power, strength, health, virility.

"A guy with a great chest looks like a warrior, wearing armor for battle. Nothing can penetrate that hull."

Among his clients, Durante says, "the chest is usually their first concern." "Every time a man looks in a mirror," adds Hayes, "whether shaving or at the gym, he sees his chest. So naturally it becomes a focus of his attention or even obsession - as opposed to back muscles, which generally go unseen and are often ignored entirely."

For most of the 20th century, weightlifting and the "300" body ideal were marginalized, regarded as fetishy by mainstream standards. Consider 1940s movie stars like Humphrey Bogart or Cary Grant, or '60s icons Steve McQueen and Paul Newman: They had looks and charisma; they were trim. But none had the Vin Diesel superhero physique or overdeveloped chest of today's cultural ideal.

"It was sometime in the '80s when it sort of all began for men," says Edisol W. Dotson, author "Behold the Man: The Hype and Selling of Male Beauty in Media and Culture" (Haworth Press, 1999). "You saw it in the 'Terminator' films and big action adventures. The early Batman films."
Pec implant surgery starts at about $7,000. Beverly Hills surgeon Adrien Aiache, who performs about three dozen procedures per year, says he charges $9,000. The massage therapist, who asked not to be identified because he is sensitive about appearing overly vain, says he paid $12,000 and has no regrets. "No one's ever said, not once, 'Are those implants?' " he claims - including the men with whom he's been intimate.

He'd thought about getting new pecs for years, but balked because of bad implants he'd seen.
"There was this one guy at a bar in the Castro, years and years ago," he said. "Oh my God, it was so obnoxiously fake. Like a Pamela Anderson kind of thing. I would never want to be that obvious."

The massage therapist shopped around, researched the pros and cons, and chose Dr. James J. Romano, a San Francisco plastic surgeon who performs 35 to 40 pec implant surgeries per year. The procedure is expensive, in part, Romano says, because the implants, manufactured by Allied Biomedicals in Ventura, cost $1,600 for a pair.

"People buy cars, right?" said the massage therapist. "People buy property. I thought, 'I'll buy a set of pecs!' Like shopping at Crate & Barrel. 'I'll take that one.' " The implants come in two shapes and five sizes, and are made from silicone - not the soft liquid gel in breast implants, but a semi-solid substance. They're slightly more firm than the consistency of a Gummy Bear.

"My close friends asked me, 'Weren't you frightened going in for that kind of surgery?' I said, 'Oh, my God, I could walk out on Powell and get hit by one of those crazy cabs.' Never postpone joy is, like, my big mantra."

Pec implants were introduced 20 years ago, Romano says, although as recently as 2000, the statistics weren't recorded by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

"It's a cult following, almost, although it's growing because of the media and the Internet." For the most part it's cosmetic, but in some cases men seek implants because of congenital deformities: They're missing ribs or a pectoral muscle on one side, or there's a natural concavity they want to correct.

During the operation, Romano says, "I make an incision high up in the armpit in the hair-bearing region. It's about three fingers wide. Then the space is made under the muscle in what we call a 'free area' in surgery: free of nerves, free of blood vessels."

Romano folds the implant in half and positions it between the pectoral muscles, sews up the incision and then repeats the process on the other side of the chest. Recovery is "mostly quite comfortable," Romano says, "and is mostly complete within two weeks."

When the massage therapist awoke in the recovery room, he remembers, "I felt like someone had beat the crap out of me. Thank God there's Demerol. It was hard for me to even get up. I was so heavy and taking all these pain pills to dull the throbbing. ... I was kind of scared. And being a massage therapist I thought, 'Oh, my God, what if I can't use my arms?' (But) I have full range of motion and I'm strong. You would just never know!"

Romano says he screens patients carefully to make sure their expectations are realistic.

"Some men come in and ask for it, and either don't have the anatomy that will allow me to do it and look good, or they want something that is too big or out of proportion. I don't take all comers."

The risks of the procedure include a possible migration. "(The implant) can move a little bit. I tell the patients, 'You're going to feel the edges sometimes when you're lifting or involved in the extreme ranges of motion or other activities. It's never going to be like your God-given chest.' But that's the art and science of putting in pectoral implants. You've got to match them to the body."

Even today, men form a tiny minority of plastic surgery patients. In 2006, there were 11.5 million cosmetic procedures performed in the United States, 1 million of which were on men. Nose reshaping was the most popular procedure for men in 2006, followed by eyelid surgery, liposuction, hair transplant and gynecoplastia - the removal of breast tissue caused by an estrogen imbalance.

So why, given the obsession for the perfect chest, haven't pec implants been more popular? One reason is that pectoral muscles are large, and with diligent workouts they can usually be developed. Women, by contrast, don't have that option when larger breasts are the goal.
Aiache of Beverly Hills thinks homophobia is also a factor.

"A lot of people with pectoral implants are gay, and many physicians don't want to take care of the gay population in general," he says. In his own practice, Aiache says, 80 percent of pectoral implant recipients are gay.


Pec implants were introduced 20 years ago, Romano says, although as recently as 2000, the statistics weren't recorded by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

"It's a cult following, almost, although it's growing because of the media and the Internet." For the most part it's cosmetic, but in some cases men seek implants because of congenital deformities: They're missing ribs or a pectoral muscle on one side, or there's a natural concavity they want to correct.

During the operation, Romano says, "I make an incision high up in the armpit in the hair-bearing region. It's about three fingers wide. Then the space is made under the muscle in what we call a 'free area' in surgery: free of nerves, free of blood vessels."

Romano folds the implant in half and positions it between the pectoral muscles, sews up the incision and then repeats the process on the other side of the chest. Recovery is "mostly quite comfortable," Romano says, "and is mostly complete within two weeks."

When the massage therapist awoke in the recovery room, he remembers, "I felt like someone had beat the crap out of me. Thank God there's Demerol. It was hard for me to even get up. I was so heavy and taking all these pain pills to dull the throbbing. ... I was kind of scared. And being a massage therapist I thought, 'Oh, my God, what if I can't use my arms?' (But) I have full range of motion and I'm strong. You would just never know!"

Romano says he screens patients carefully to make sure their expectations are realistic.

"Some men come in and ask for it, and either don't have the anatomy that will allow me to do it and look good, or they want something that is too big or out of proportion. I don't take all comers."

The risks of the procedure include a possible migration. "(The implant) can move a little bit. I tell the patients, 'You're going to feel the edges sometimes when you're lifting or involved in the extreme ranges of motion or other activities. It's never going to be like your God-given chest.' But that's the art and science of putting in pectoral implants. You've got to match them to the body."

Even today, men form a tiny minority of plastic surgery patients. In 2006, there were 11.5 million cosmetic procedures performed in the United States, 1 million of which were on men. Nose reshaping was the most popular procedure for men in 2006, followed by eyelid surgery, liposuction, hair transplant and gynecoplastia - the removal of breast tissue caused by an estrogen imbalance.

So why, given the obsession for the perfect chest, haven't pec implants been more popular? One reason is that pectoral muscles are large, and with diligent workouts they can usually be developed. Women, by contrast, don't have that option when larger breasts are the goal.
Aiache of Beverly Hills thinks homophobia is also a factor.

"A lot of people with pectoral implants are gay, and many physicians don't want to take care of the gay population in general," he says. In his own practice, Aiache says, 80 percent of pectoral implant recipients are gay.

"Pec implants have much more shame attached to them than, say, breast implants," says Durante. "Breast implants are so widely known that even though they are 'spotted' or 'suspected,' they are part of the cultural landscape. There is also a vanity attached to pec implants: They may be considered a character flaw (in the man). He's seen as weak."

San Francisco plastic surgeon James Anthony doesn't perform pec implants surgery, in part because of the risks. "It's possible to have malpositioning of the implant, where it's in the wrong spot and one's a little higher than the other. It also has a chance of infection, but any foreign body has a chance of infection. And then the other thing you have to be careful of is not to damage the nerve that goes to the nipple. Because otherwise you get numbness, which is a consideration for some men."

Opinions differ on the attractiveness of pec implants. Durante says the majority look obvious "because they don't match their shoulder and arm development - not unlike a woman whose breast implants are too big." Hayes said he finds implants "rigid and plasticky."

Maura Armstrong Morgan, an echocardiographer with Golden Gate Radiology in San Francisco, has her own problem with implants, pectoral or breast alike. "You can't see through them with sonar. They block the sound waves, so you're unable to obtain useable images," she said. "Normally, you shoot between the ribs and get this wonderful image of a beating heart."

With implants, "you get this big, egg-shaped void. ... So I have to shoot obliquely. I had one patient doing everything but standing on their head to get a picture of their heart."

Before he had the pectoral implants, the massage therapist said his chest was "OK." "But I just wanted it to be more. The whole peacock image, if you like. You want a bigger spread of feathers. ... It's a bit of a magnet."

Some people understand his decision to get the implants, and some people don't. "There's a community out there that says, 'Oh, God, why would you do plastic surgery?' And I'm like, whatever. 'Why do people eat at McDonald's every day?' You could go on and on forever, right?"

Leonard Kashio uses only POMEGA5 products




Saturday, March 29, 2008

New concentrated form of pomegranate antioxidants - the un - omega 5 oil form

Students in China are excited over Omega 5 oil products


Published research on POMx shows similar health benefits to pomegranate juice (press release)

Three years after introducing consumers to the health benefits and delicious taste of the world’s first refrigerated, super-premium pomegranate juice, POM Wonderful® announced today that it has developed a concentrated form of pomegranate antioxidants known as POMx.
POMx, already being noted by medical researchers as an important natural ingredient, is so concentrated that only a small amount is needed to obtain an optimal level of daily antioxidants. For consumers who are not seeking additional calories and sugars, this is an important product benefit.
POMx comes from the same Wonderful variety of pomegranates that are used to make POM Wonderful’s healthy pomegranate juices. It also has a similar biochemical profile to pomegranate juice since both contain a diverse range of phytochemicals, of which polyphenols make up a large proportion. POMx is currently an active ingredient in POM Tea (http://pomtea.com), a refreshing, healthy, ready-to-drink iced tea that is available in retail stores nationally.

According to Michael Aviram, DSc, Professor of Biochemistry and Head Lipid Research Laboratory, Technion Faculty of Medicine and Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, who was at the forefront of the initial research on pomegranates, the research on POMx looks very promising. In 2006, Aviram led a study on POMx, which was recently published (Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 2006 54:1928-1935). Commenting on this research, Professor Aviram remarks, “The results showed that POMx is as potent an antioxidant as pomegranate juice and just like pomegranate juice may protect against cardiovascular as well as other diseases.”

The POMx research comes as the benefits derived from the Wonderful variety of pomegranate are, once again, being noted by the worldwide medical community. Recently, the American Association for Cancer Research published research that indicates that a daily pomegranate regimen has a positive effect for men with prostate cancer. Specifically, drinking 8 ounces of POM Wonderful pomegranate juice daily prolonged post-prostate surgery PSA doubling time from 15 to 54 months (Clinical Cancer Research, July 1, 2006). PSA is a protein marker for prostate cancer and the faster PSA levels increase in the blood of men after treatment, the greater their potential for dying of prostate cancer.

David Heber, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine and Director, UCLA Center for Human Nutrition, provided additional commentary on POMx as it relates to prostate cancer. “Basic studies indicate that the effects of POMx and POM Wonderful pomegranate juice on prostate cancer are the same. The most abundant and most active ingredients in pomegranate juice are also found in POMx.”
POMEGA5 products


Thursday, March 27, 2008

TSA might be sued over a nipple ring fiasco

What this story has got to do with Omega 5 oil?
We recommend that you use POMEGA5 skin care to treat your nipples' skin after the piercing is removed
it will be sore
LOS ANGELES — A Texas woman who said she was forced to remove a nipple ring with pliers in order to board an airplane called Thursday for an apology by federal security agents and a civil rights investigation.

"I wouldn't wish this experience upon anyone," Mandi Hamlin said at a news conference. "My experience with TSA was a nightmare I had to endure. No one deserves to be treated this way."
Hamlin, 37, said she was trying to board a flight from Lubbock to Dallas on Feb. 24 when she was scanned by a Transportation Security Administration agent after passing through a larger metal detector without problems.

The female TSA agent used a handheld detector that beeped when it passed in front of Hamlin's chest, the Dallas-area resident said.

Hamlin said she told the woman she was wearing nipple piercings. The women then called over her male colleagues, one of whom said she would have to remove the jewelry, Hamlin said.

Hamlin said she could not remove them and asked whether she could instead display her pierced breasts in private to the female agent. But several other male officers told her she could not board her flight until the jewelry was out, she said.

She was taken behind a curtain and managed to remove one bar-shaped piercing but had trouble with the second, a ring.

"Still crying, she informed the TSA officer that she could not remove it without the help of pliers, and the officer gave a pair to her," said Hamlin's attorney, Gloria Allred, reading from a letter she sent Thursday to the director of the TSA's Office of Civil Rights and Liberties.

Hamlin said she heard male TSA agents snickering as she took out the ring. She was scanned again and was allowed to board even though she still was wearing a belly button ring.

"After nipple rings are inserted, the skin can often heal around the piercing, and the rings can be extremely difficult and painful to remove," Allred said in the letter.

Hamlin filed a complaint, but the TSA's customer service manager at the Lubbock airport concluded the screening was handled properly, Allred said.

Allred said she might consider legal action if the TSA does not apologize.

On its Web site, the TSA warns that passengers "may be additionally screened because of hidden items such as body piercings, which alarmed the metal detector."

"If you are selected for additional screening, you may ask to remove your body piercing in private as an alternative to a pat-down search," the site says.
No nipples piercing here
Pomegranates -- the source for omega 5 oil


Hamlin said she heard male TSA agents snickering as she took out the ring. She was scanned again and was allowed to board even though she still was wearing a belly button ring.

"After nipple rings are inserted, the skin can often heal around the piercing, and the rings can be extremely difficult and painful to remove," Allred said in the letter.

Hamlin would have accepted a "pat-down" had it been offered, Allred said.

Hamlin was publicly humiliated and has "undergone an enormous amount of physical pain to have the nipple rings reinserted" because of scar tissue, Allred said.

"The conduct of TSA was cruel and unnecessary," Allred wrote. "The last time that I checked a nipple was not a dangerous weapon."

TSA spokesman Dwayne Baird said he was unaware of the incident. There is no specific TSA policy on dealing with body piercings, he said, "as long as it doesn't sound the alarms."

If an alarm does sound, "until that is resolved, we're not going to let them go through the checkpoint, no matter what they're wearing or where they're wearing it."

People routinely pass through security wearing wedding rings without problems, and it might take a larger bit of metal to trigger an alarm, Baird said.
Pliers or nipple ring -- the TSA dilema
Go for Omega 5 oil


Green skin care
pomegranate seed oil

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Teeth whitening and fantastic skin care by POMEGA5 go together

Omega 5 products will maintain the silky feel of your skin
Now you can tend to your teeth
Best Teeth Whitening Product Reviews


A rating, review, and comparison of the various "Teeth Whitening" products sold on the internet.
I quote the word "Teeth Whitening" because not all of the products reviewed actually whiten your teeth! Yes, they are all marketed as teeth whiteners, but not all of them are, in fact many are just gimmicks that range in price any where from $10 to $1000! The fact is that some teeth whitening products do actually work! The problems is cutting through the hype to find out which ones are real and work, which ones are real and kinda work, and which ones are just overpriced gimmicks!

That is exactly the purpose of this website, as I was in the same position you are in a year ago when I first heard about all the new teeth whitening methods in the fashion magazines and on TV. I wish there was a site like this a year ago, so I could have cut through the hype, and just purchased the one that actually delivers results. All in all, I think it was worth it, as I now know first hand what WORKS and what DOESN'T, and if you're like me, you wouldn't mind trying a few different products to find that one product that can dramatically enhance your smile, confidence, and overall appearance.

I honestly never thought that increasing the brightness of my smile a few shades would make much of difference in my overall look, but now I can't imagine going a day without my favorite teeth whitening product. Ofcorse, I never had a terrible smile, just some very slight discoloration (probably caused by my little Starbuck's habit), but nothing major. I never received compliments about my "about average" smile, and if I ever did catch a compliment, it was usually the standard "beautiful eyes" line. But now after 4 months of using my favorite teeth whitener, I get 2-3 compliments a day about how "nice" my smile is from both men and women. I also seem to be getting kissed by my boyfriend a lot more often (always a good thing)... So, here are my honest teeth whitening reviews:


My Number One Pick:Celebrity Sexy Teeth is the winner, too bad I didn't find it first. I first heard about this product when E! News recommended it in their Spring Style picks last year, and so far I must agree with E! that this is the best Teeth Whitener on the market. The difference with this Teeth Whitener is that you get both short-term and long-term whitening as it works with both the inner and outer enamel. Aside from the scientific reasoning, the results are absolutely fabulous,, and unlike other products, there was NO sensitivity! In addition to delivering a whitening effect that the others just can't compare to, it also happens to be quickest, cleanest, and least expensive method I've tried. I absolutely love it, it only takes a few seconds to get your teeth perly white, and there's no mess or pain. Using this product, I was able to move up 7 shades, and once my boyfriend saw me using it, he started using it and saw an improvement of 9 shades!


2

Runner Up:Britesmile was the first teeth whitening method I had ever tried. The old BriteSmile commercials really got me excited about teeth whitening. When I first tried Britesmile in 2003, I was pretty happy with the results as I saw an improvement of 7 shades, however I wasn't so happy with the $600 bill. There was no pain during the first 40 minutes, but the last 20 minute session was borderline intolerable as my teeth became super sensitive. I reluntantly tried Britesmile again in early 2006 when the price had dropped to $400, and saw an improvement of 6 shades this time. Britesmile definitely works, however, aside from the hefty price, you're also instructed not to eat any "colored" foods for the next 3-4 days (that means you can only eat cottage cheese and cauliflower for 96 hours! Uhh! )


3

GoSmile is another popular teeth whitening product. GoSmile is fairly effective, and like Celebrity Sexy Teeth, does not cause tooth sensitivity. However it only gets 3 stars as I only saw on improvement of 4 shades with GoSmile versus 7 shades from Celebrity Sexy Teeth. I do however love the way GoSmile is packaged, I just wish their product was a bit more effective.


4

ZOOM Teeth Whitening gets 2 stars because it does work fairly well (I saw an improvement of 5 shades), but it's way too expensive at $1000-$1200, and it causes extreme tooth sensitivity. Two of my friends that tried ZOOM also complained about terrible tooth sensitivity for days after the treatment.

5

Crest Whitestrips Premium Plus are Crest's fifth attempt at making a decent teeth whitening product. After using this product for 3 weeks, I did see an improvement of 2 shades. This falls under the "teeth whiteners that kinda work" category so it is only recommended as a back up when you run out of Celebrity Sexy Teeth or GoSmile. The only reason it gets 2 stars is because it's the only product you'll find in the drug store that will give you any results, just not much at 2 shades.


6

Crest Whitestrips Supreme are one of Crest's earlier teeth whitening products that was heavily promoted on TV commercials. Unfortunately, this product simply does not work. ZERO shades of improvements after using this product for 2 weeks. Worse yet, it causes slight tooth sensitivity! No wonder Crest had to come out with several new versions after releasing this ineffective product! Complete waste of money!

The POMEGA5 collection -- the top rate Omega 5 skin care



7

Same as above, Listerine Whitening Quick Dissolving Strips are a little less expensive than Crest Whitestrips Supreme, but again simply do not work! Still a waste of money. Not recommended, read above.


Last Words:
For women wanting to enhance their appearance, a good teeth whitener is a must! Women often underestimate the importance of having a brighter smile. Aside from your eyes, which first impression characteristic do people usually remember about you? Think about it! A whiter, brighter smile equals youth and friendliness! If you're reading this, I'm sure you feel the same way. That's why I tried all of these Teeth Whitening methods, and since I know which ones worked for me and which ones didn't, I figure I should let everyone know. It's my way of giving you some good info, getting back at the products that didn't work, and thanking those that worked for me. As said above, I completely recommend Celebrity Sexy Teeth, it's a potent Teeth Whitener that works. Britesmile is good too, but is pricier and not as effective. Both come with a money-back guarantee, so your best bet may be to try both and stay with the one that gives you the perfect smile!


Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Study: women who normally buy natural / organic beauty products such as POMEGA5 have a much higher makeup and skin aspirations than traditional users

Heidi Redman loves POMEGA 5 all natural products



Marketing Matters: Why She Won’t Buy Naturals ...


With all the hype about natural makeup and organic skin care, and with all of the alarms sounding daily about cosmetic ingredients now found to harm instead of help—why aren’t all women jumping on the natural/organic bandwagon?
Simply put: they’re not ready yet—but just wait.
Just who are these brash women, still loyal to their science-based cosmetics brands, still daring to slather parabens and artificial fragrances on their faces and refusing to take heed of the headlines, or to their inner holistic beauty goddesses? They’re about half the U.S. population of regular female beauty buyers (those who have bought beauty products in the past 12 months)—or, to be more precise, 51% of beauty buying women, according to the The Benchmarking Company’s “The Age of Naturals” Pink Report (Jan. 2008).
The differences between how women who’ve (so far) shunned the natural/organic beauty buying trend and those who embrace it are intriguing both demographically and psychologically.
The Demographic and Socioeconomic Breakdown “The Age of Naturals” posed numerous questions to women about themselves and their families. Among other facts, it showed that 52% of traditional beauty buying women are employed either full- or part-time (compared to 58% of the natural beauty buyers).
Traditional beauty buyers claim to hold slightly less stressful jobs, with 44% of traditional buyers indicating they experience “moderate to high” levels of on-the-job stress, compared with 51% of natural beauty buyers. Sixty-four percent of traditional beauty buyers have a household income of less than $50,000 per year, compared to the 54% of their natural beauty buying sisters.
Traditional beauty buyers are slightly less educated than those who claim to buy natural/organic beauty, with 33% of traditional buyers holding at least an associates degree, compared to 44% of the naturals buyers. Only 56% of traditional beauty buyers say they exercise regularly, compared with 78% of natural beauty buyers. Consequently, traditional beauty buyers tend to wear larger dress sizes than natural beauty buyers, with 41% of traditional buyers wearing a size 16+ dress, compared to 28% of natural beauty buyers.
The Psychological Breakdown
The natural beauty buyer’s attitudes toward personal wellness mirror her consumer behavior. In The Benchmarking Company’s standard 17-question personal wellness catalog, natural/organic beauty buyers ranked every statement higher, sometimes twice as high, as traditional beauty buyers. For instance, 84% of natural beauty buyers believe the mind and body are connected for overall wellness, compared to 70% of traditional beauty buyers. Only 7% of traditional beauty buyers meditate regularly versus 19% of natural beauty buyers. Natural beauty buyers are 23% more likely to believe in the concept of inside/out beauty than traditional buyers, and nearly twice as many natural beauty buyers believe in holistic medicine.Seventy four percent of consumers of traditional beauty products admit they don’t know the difference between a natural product and an organic product, and, of those, 54% don’t care to know. It’s not a high priority for them as they haven’t embraced the concept of “all-natural” or inside/out beauty as a lifestyle choice.
Women who normally buy natural/organic beauty products such as Pomega5, omega 5 oil based products have much higher makeup and skin care aspirations than traditional beauty brand users, and they have higher expectations for natural or organic beauty product efficacy. Eighty-two percent of natural/organic beauty buyers want to look beautiful yet natural, compared with 64% of their traditional buying counterparts.
Natural beauty buyers want both makeup (84%) and skin care products (84%) to be free of harmful chemicals, compared to 56% of traditional beauty buyers for makeup and 54% for skin care products. When asked to rank how much she agrees or disagrees with natural/organic lifestyle questions on a 1–5 scale, those who normally buy natural beauty tended to post a higher agreement level to the questions. While 83% of natural buyers agreed that natural beauty products were more expensive than synthetic ones, compared to 69% of traditional beauty buyers, 54% of natural buyers also agreed that they perform as well as traditionally made brands, compared with 19% of those who predominantly buy traditional beauty products.
Traditional beauty consumers are skeptical that a product called natural or organic will work as well as traditional beauty brands, but later sections of the report revealed that they are also curious and willing to give natural beauty brands a try.
For instance, when asked which type of cosmetic brand (from the choices of a mass, prestige or natural brand) is best for a woman’s skin, 50% of traditional beauty buyers said natural brands are best (with 28% believing mass were best for skin and 22% saying prestige brands were best). Still, a slight majority of traditional beauty buyers feel that mass-market brands make them look their best at 35%, with 33% believing prestige brands do the trick, and 32% believing natural brands are the most successful.
Why Not Buy More Natural/Organic Beauty Products?
“The Age of Naturals” asked traditional beauty buying women why they don’t usually buy natural or organic beauty brands, allowing them to pick all that apply from a list of possible reasons.
The number one reason they gave is that it just hasn’t occurred to them to give naturals a try. With the thousands of brands on the market clamoring for both attention and disposable income, 50% of traditional beauty buyers just haven’t given it a thought yet, and 49% don’t know enough about them to make a decision. Another third aren’t automatically jumping on the natural/organic bandwagon because their current brands work just fine for them.
And while these women say that natural/organic beauty brands are “too expensive” to try them (45%), surveys and focus groups show that expense will always take a back seat to the emotional reasons behind a purchase.
Why She Might Give Natural Beauty A Try
The four pillars of non-natural beauty use (complacency, expense, ignorance and skepticism) are often swept away by simple curiosity—the desire to try what’s new and popular. No matter how many times the questions are asked (why did you switch brands? what made you first try a certain brand?), the answer that is usually first and foremost is curiosity.
That was also true in “The Age of Naturals,” with curiosity ranking as the number one reason why women who normally buy natural beauty first did so.
However, fear ranks a close second for reasons to try natural beauty brands. This year’s cosmetics headlines have been inundated with fears about parabens, hydroquinone (yet again), lead in lipstick and other potential toxins. In the absence of U.S. government regulation on cosmetic ingredients as a whole, some watchdog groups are making it seem like traditional cosmetic manufacturers are asking women to smear pure toxicity on their skin. Women who tested POMEGA5 showd no fear as the sensed the high quality of the products.
Forty-five percent of all women said the main reason they buy natural/organic beauty products is because of their fear of chemicals. When later asked to check reasons (among many) why natural beauty buyers purchase natural/organic beauty products, 80% said they were better for the skin and 64% cited their desire to avoid placing chemicals on their skin. Another 27% cited that the ingredients in traditional beauty products were harmful to their health.
The sense of ingredient uneasiness is felt by traditional beauty buyers as well. Seventy-two percent of traditional beauty buying women felt the most appealing language when considering a natural beauty product is “XXX-FREE,” meaning free of harmful chemicals; 74% of natural beauty buyers felt the same way, ranking such language as the single most appealing terminology when considering a natural beauty product.
A Pomega5 basket

Traditional beauty product buying women also warmed to terms such as “clean” (62%), “hypoallergenic” (62%) and “pure” (57%). These women also felt the greatest emotional attachment to beauty product claims that clearly explain nature’s benefits in soothing wording and speak to each natural ingredient’s health benefit.
The Benchmarking Company tested seven actual on-the-market beauty brand product claims/wording, and found that soothing wording that clearly explains nature’s benefits creates a powerful claim that 73% of all women (and 59% of traditional beauty buying women, the largest percentage of claims believability for this group) find most believable.
As the claims became slightly more complex, and then more scientifically/statistically oriented rather than naturally oriented, they became more unbelievable to all women.Perhaps most telling of all, because women wish for products containing less harmful chemicals, a full 90% of traditional beauty buying women “might” or “would definitely” be willing to try an organic beauty brand if the brand earned the USDA Organic Seal.
Even though attaining the certification is difficult, there are few real beauty brands that have earned it and it sets them a step above the crowd.
The Benchmarking Company believes the USDA seal will serve as an absolute indicator of trust and safety to consumers in the future—and an emblem many companies will not be able to afford to be without.Natural and organic beauty products are in their infancy. Many women consider them a natural extension of the holistic lifestyle they are already living or want to lead.
Expect greater consumer education about them, more detailed labeling that explains how or why a product will help women live a more holistic lifestyle while helping them to also look their best, and a stronger desire for proven products that help women to look better than traditionally made brands. In addition, to help sway the non-natural believers, look for greater demand for third-party independent testing to prove product efficacy; products proven to be safe and natural offering advanced technical efficacy stand to gain.




Detroit Mayor Denies Guilt in Sex-Text Scandal BLOG
Court Sides With Texas in Death Row Dispute With Bush
Ex-WCW Wrestler Found Dead of Apparent Overdose
FOX Business: Court Rejects Air Passenger Bill of Rights
Firefight in Southern Iraq, Militia Vows Civil Disobedience
Son Honors Dying Dad's Wish, Hires Stripper for Funeral
Pentagon Says It Mistakenly Sent Missile Parts to Taiwan
Baby Boy Born Missing Bones May Lose Arms, Legs- Custom Wheelchairs Keep Old Pets Rolling PHOTOS
URGENT: Suicide Suspected in Mysterious Cop Death
High School Cheerleader Dies After Breast Surgery- Parents' Outraged Over Girl Self-Image Web Site
URGENT: Iowa Man Died in Crash After Killing Wife, Kids
2 Killed in Tibetan Monk Protest PHOTOS (Graphic)
Freight, Commuter Trains Collide in Massachusetts
Critics: Engineers Hid Flaws in 9/11, Katrina Probes
Miami Crane Collapse Kills 2, Injures 5 PHOTOS
Cops: 13-Year-Old 'Madame' Pimped Young Girls

Monday, March 24, 2008

Study: 71 percent of adults are interested in the potential of Greentech

Loretta Lyn of Deam & co is reviewing the POMEGA5 executive summary




According to the 2007 National Technology Readiness survey, 71 percent of adults are interested in green technology. Word of mouth is the key to green tech marketing, reports an Environmental Leader article. The piece says the market has the potential to earn $104 billion in sales this year, and the people most committed to the environment — 10 percent of adult consumers — are also very enthusiastic about technology. The segment skews to younger, social-network savvy adults who blog and advise others.

This Wall Street Journal interview with Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers partner John Doerr reveals that Silicon Valley venture capitalists are banking big on green technology. Kleiner Perkins has invested $250 million of its $700 million portfolio in green tech. According to Doerr, VCs are investing heavily in companies developing alternative fuels, fuel-efficient devices and other “clean” technologies such as Omega 5 oil greentech.

And at a two-day conference in Silicon Valley over the weekend, Nordic Green ‘08 provided Nordic companies involved in green tech with an opportunity to present their products and build relationships with the Valley’s leading entrepreneurs, investors and industry heavyweights.
POMEGA5 -- Greentech in nutraceuticals



Always On Nordic Green ’08

Nordic companies involved in renewable energy and other forms of green technology are to present their products to businesses and decision-makers in the heart of of Silicon Valley, California.

The two-day conference ‘Nordic Green 2008’ is part of the Always On series of events designed to bring together representatives of green industries and entrepreneurs from various spheres.
Nordic Energy Research, one of the organisations supporting the conference, sees it as an opportunity to bring together companies involved in solar energy, construction, wind power, bio-fuels, bio-gas, etc.As well as an opportunity to network with decision-makers and representatives of other business, the conference will also offer a number of lectures and panel debates designed to highlight the potential business opportunities for green technology in California.
The conference will be held on 21 and 22 April. On Monday, the Director of Nordic Energy Research, Birte Holst Jørgensen, will address the conference about the future for Nordic innovation as part of the the theme 'Nordic Green Tech Strongholds'
Sea waves can be harnessed to generate power or electricity



Sunday, March 23, 2008

UK Beauty Queen -- what a terrific girl


England's first size 16 beauty queen



Normal ... at size 16 Chloe Marshall is average for a British woman.
A trainee beautician has become the first size 16 candidate to reach the finals of the Miss England competition.
Chloe Marshall, from Guildford, is 79.8 kilograms, 1.78 metres tall and has a 38DD bust. The 16-year-old beat a bevy of slimmer hopefuls to be crowned Miss Surrey."Everybody thinks you have to be a tall, slim blonde and I'm a curvy brunette," she said.
"I want to show it is possible to be beautiful and not a standard size zero. "The reaction I've had is great. Other girls have told me I have really boosted their confidence, which is terrific," said Chloe, who is the average size for a British woman.



Sex and the Bicycles -- the more you bike the less sensation your will enjoy -- Omega 5 oil can help

One solution -- use a motorized bike



Genital Sensation and Sexual Function in Women Bicyclists and Runners:
Are Your Feet Safer than Your Seat?
ORIGINAL RESEARCH—WOMEN’S SEXUAL HEALTH

ABSTRACT


Introduction.


Bicycling is associated with neurological impairment and impotence in men. Similar deficits have not been confirmed in women.

Aim.


To evaluate the effects of bicycling on genital sensation and sexual function in women.


Methods.


Healthy, premenopausal, competitive women bicyclists and runners (controls) were compared.


Main Outcome Measures.


(1) Genital vibratory thresholds (VTs) were determined using the Medoc Vibratory Sensation Analyzer 3000.


(2) Sexual function and sexually related distress were assessed by the Dennerstein Personal Experience Questionnaire (SPEQ) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS).


Results.


Forty-eight bicyclists and 22 controls were enrolled. The median age was 33 years. The bicyclists were older, had higher body mass indices (BMIs), were more diverse in their sexual orientation, and were more likely to have a current partner. Bicyclists rode an average of 28.3 ± 19.7 miles/day (range 4–100), 3.8 ± 1.5 days/week, for an average of 2.1 ± 1.8 hours/ride.


The mean number of years riding was 7.9 ± 7.1 years (range 0.5–30). Controls ran an average of 4.65 ± 2.1 miles/day (range 1.5–8) and 5.0 ± 1.2 days/week. On bivariate analysis, bicyclists had significantly higher VTs than runners, indicating worse neurological function at all sites (P <>
In bicyclists, there were no correlations between VTs and miles biked per week, duration of riding, or BMI. Composite SPEQ scores indicated normal sexual function in all sexually active subjects. Neither group suffered from sexually related distress.
Omega 5 oil product will help you beautify your skin




Conclusion.

There is an association between bicycling and decreased genital sensation in competitive women bicyclists. Negative effects on sexual function and quality of life were not apparent in our young, healthy premenopausal cohort. Guess MK, Connell K, Schrader S, Reutman S, Wang A, LaCombe J, Toennis C, Lowe B, Melman A, and Mikhail MK. Genital sensation and sexual function in women bicyclists and runners: Are your feet safer than your seat? J Sex Med 2006;3:1018–1027.

Marsha K. Guess, MD,**Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, Marsha K. Guess, MD, Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, Room 308, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Tel: (203) 785-3469; Fax: (203) 430 8586; E-mail: marsha.guess@yale.edu Kathleen Connell, MD,††Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and Steven Schrader, PhD,‡‡National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Reproductive Health Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA Susan Reutman, PhD,‡‡National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Reproductive Health Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA Andrea Wang, MD,††Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and Julie LaCombe, MD,††Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and Christine Toennis, PhD,‡‡National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Reproductive Health Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA Brian Lowe, PhD,‡‡National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Reproductive Health Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA Arnold Melman, MD,††Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and and Magdy Mikhail, MD††Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and *Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, †Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health and Urology, Albert Einstein College of edicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, and ‡National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health—Reproductive Health Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA Marsha K. Guess, MD, Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive, Yale University School of Medicine
Women in red support the Omega 5 movement


www.pomega5.com
Ashley Alexadra Dupree
www.ggw.com
Silda Spizter
Report: JPMorgan in Talks to Increase Bear Bid Fivefold
Pope Calls for Peace in Mideast PHOTOS VIDEO
Bomb Kills 4 U.S. Soldiers in Baghdad; Green Zone Hit
NCAA Tournament: Davidson Upsets Georgetown 74-70
Cheney Presses Peace in West Bank PHOTOS VIDEO
Fishing Boat Sinks Off Alaskan Coast, Killing 4
Report: Uday Hussein Plotted London Assassination
Report: Spitzer Nemesis Tipped FBI to Call Girl Use
Grammy-Winning Singer Critically Injured in Bus Crash
Drug Bust Nets a Ton of Marijuana, $3 Million, 82 Guns
Georgia Hiker Fought Hard Against Convicted Killer
Fuel Convoy Meant for U.S Forces Erupts in Pakistan
L.A. Cops Nab Suspected 'Weather Girl Bandit'
21-Year-Old Message in Bottle Travels 1,735 Miles
Skeleton Found on Staten Island in Search for N.J. Mom
U.S. Web Host Yanks Anti-Islam Film Site

Organic skin care
pomegranate seed oil

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Study: what do women prefer, Cialis or Viagra, the female perspective...

Alan and Josh love when their women use POMEGA5 oil products



Study: Women prefer Cialis!!

Investigating Women's Preference for Sildenafil or Tadalafil Use by Their Partners with Erectile Dysfunction: The Partners' Preference Study
Sildenafil is a viagra ingredient
Tadalafil s a cialis ingredient

Helen M. Conaglen, PhD,**University of Waikato—Psychology, Hamilton, New Zealand;Helen M. Conaglen, PhD, PO Box 4423, Hamilton East, Hamilton, New Zealand 3247. Tel: +64-7-834-1520; Fax: +64-7-834-1519; E-mail: helen@tpc.org.nz and John V. Conaglen, MB ChB, MD, FRACP††University of Auckland—Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Hamilton, New Zealand*University of Waikato—Psychology, Hamilton, New Zealand; †University of Auckland—Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Hamilton, New Zealand Helen M. Conaglen, PhD,
Introduction.
Several preference studies comparing a short-acting with a longer-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor have been conducted in men. Most men in those studies preferred tadalafil rather than sildenafil, and recent post hoc analysis of one study described several factors associated with men's treatment preference. No prospective studies have investigated the woman partners' preferences.

Aim.
To investigate the treatment preference of women who were partners of men using oral medications for erectile dysfunction (ED) in a single-center open-label crossover study.

Methods.
One hundred heterosexual couples in stable relationships, with male partners having ED based on the erectile function subscale of the International Index of Erectile Function, were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil or tadalafil for a 12-week phase, followed by another 12-week period using the alternate drug. Male and female participants completed sexual event diaries during both study phases, and the female participants were interviewed at baseline, midpoint, and end of study.

Main Outcome Measures.
Primary outcome data were the women's final interviews during which they were asked which drug they preferred and their reasons for that preference.

Results.
WOMEN LIKE CIALAIS
A total of 79.2% of the women preferred their partners' use of tadalafil, while 15.6% preferred sildenafil.
Preference was not affected by age or treatment order randomization.
Women preferring tadalafil reported feeling more relaxed, experiencing less pressure, and enjoying a more natural or spontaneous sexual experience as reasons for their choice. Mean number of tablets used, events recorded, events per week, and days between events were not significantly different during each study phase.
Conclusion.
Women's preferences were similar to men when using these two drugs.
While the women's reasons for preferring tadalafil emphasized relaxed, satisfying, longer-lasting sexual experiences, those preferring sildenafil focused on satisfaction and drug effectiveness for their partner.
Conaglen HM, and Conaglen JV. Investigating women's preference for sildenafil or tadalafil use by their partners with erectile dysfunction: The partners' preference study. J Sex Med **;**:**–**.

Loti prefers Viagra and Omega 5 oil products
green technology
Natural skin care
Ashley Alexandra Dupre
Silda Spitzer